Thomson Rogers Webinar Series: The Burden of Proof: Proving Losses and Causation
Thank you to everyone who attended our Thomson Rogers Webinar Series “The Burden of Proof: Proving Losses and Causation” held September 25, 2020 conducted by Thomson Rogers’ personal injury lawyers Robert Ben, Deanna Gilbert and Lucy Jackson.
• Standard burden of proof in a civil case (tort & AB): balance of probabilities.
- Lower than “beyond a reasonable doubt” or “100% medical certainty”
- Equivalent to a probability of 51% or higher
- Words that do not satisfy the burden: possibly, maybe, may, could, might
- Word that do satisfy the burden: on a balance of probabilities, probably, likely, more likely than not, will, would.
- Lower burden than a balance of probabilities
- Only applicable to future losses/needs/risks
- “Real and substantial possibility” or “real and substantial risk”
- Must be more than fanciful, speculative, or remote possibility
- Signals lower level of confidence
- Consequences: expert for other side may be preferred or Plaintiff/insured may be given a lower reward
- Plaintiff/insured generally has to prove on a balance of probabilities
- Words matter
- Where even a future risk/need/loss can be proved on a balance of probabilities, then say so. Only resort to the exception where must
- Point is to ensure that your words accurately reflect what you are actually trying to convey
To view all previous Thomson Rogers Webinar Series please click here.