Preserving Access to Justice: Resisting the Push to Restrict Tort Rights

Author(s):

November 13, 2009

Many authors have struggled with the challenge of defining the concepts of access to justice and tort law.  Defining these concepts,  however,  is  less  important  than recognizing  the  historical  context  behind  the  development  of  these  concepts  and their  evolution. The impact on human interaction and conduct as well as the important social policy functions of these concepts ought to be the focus. They have developed primarily to recognize important fundamental obligations that allow people to live peaceably. Although access to justice and tort are separate and distinct concepts, they overlap in important ways.

Paper: Preserving Access to Justice: Resisting the Push to Restrict Tort Rights

View PowerPoint Presentation

Share this


Related articles:

Sloan H. Mandel, Alex Mladenovic, Deana S. Gilbert

Thomson Rogers Secures Important Victory in Denman v. Radovanovic Appeal: Court of Appeal Upholds $8.5 Million Informed Consent Verdict and $3 Million Cost Award

Read more
Mandatory Car Accident Benefits to be Reduced Once Again

Mandatory Car Accident Benefits To Be Reduced Once Again

Read more
Simplifying Motor Vehicle Litigation by Eliminating the “Threshold"

Simplifying Motor Vehicle Litigation by Eliminating the “Threshold”

Read more
Sloan H. Mandel, Alex Mladenovic, Deana S. Gilbert

Thomson Rogers Secures Important Victory in Denman v. Radovanovic Appeal: Court of Appeal Upholds $8.5 Million Informed Consent Verdict and $3 Million Cost Award

Read more
Mandatory Car Accident Benefits to be Reduced Once Again

Mandatory Car Accident Benefits To Be Reduced Once Again

Read more
Simplifying Motor Vehicle Litigation by Eliminating the “Threshold"

Simplifying Motor Vehicle Litigation by Eliminating the “Threshold”

Read more

Stay Informed

Subscribe to receive updates on the latest news from Thomson Rogers as well as invitations to seminars, webinars and more.

Sign up now